Masthead graphic based on a painting by Gudrun Thriemer.

Showing posts with label humanitarian law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label humanitarian law. Show all posts

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Tito Drago, "RIGHTS-SPAIN: ‘Universal Justice’ Threatened," IPS, June 23, 2009.

[Spain's universal jurisdiction law and its implementation were seen as a solution to the "institutional conflict of interest" that comes into play when national courts attempt to try violators of international laws. As Amnesty International puts it,

"Recognizing that impunity exists mainly when the national authorities of countries affected by the crimes fail to act, it is important that the national criminal and civil justice systems of all countries can step in to prosecute the crimes on behalf of the international community and award reparations to victims."
As this IPS article points out, an international criminal may be "well-loved and well-known" at home. National courts are notoriously polite to their own nationals where international crimes are concerned. The Bronze Star awarded to the drugged American pilot who accidentally killed four Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan and Ariel Sharon's loss of a cabinet portfolio for his role in the Sabra and Chatilla massacres are classic examples. But the list goes on.

In Canada and the US, "self-regulation" is a concept appropriated from individual psychology where it is a laudable, if not fully achievable, aspiration. Transferred to the legal realm where it is used, largely by ideologues who don't believe in regulation, to create the illusion that corporate entities and collectives of professionals such as police, doctors and educators embody such specialized and arcane values that they can be regulated (if at all) by no one but themselves. Environmental self-monitoring and self-regulation are the norm in British Columbia. It does save money.

IPS doesn't identify the interests behind the change in the Spanish legislation, but it does quote Mónica Cavagna, head of the Asociación Argentina Pro Derechos Humanos de Madrid (Argentine human rights association of Madrid), who describes the new law as "an effort to merge the interests of the people with the interests of their governments." It also cites Spanish lawyer Gonzalo Boyé, who told IPS the law "would demonstrate that political and economic interests are stronger than respect for the law." -jlt]

MADRID, Jun 23 (IPS) - Spain, considered a pioneer in the area of universal justice and especially legal action in human rights cases, is about to take a step backwards in that regard. On Tuesday, activists and legal experts criticised a draft law that would limit the Spanish courts’ ability to investigate human rights abuses committed in other countries.

Leading jurists called together Monday and Tuesday by a score of human rights groups to discuss the situation agreed that the draft law to be introduced by the Spanish government to Congress Thursday would undermine human rights advances made in this country’s legislation.

   68 cases of crimes committed outside of Spain are currently being prosecuted here, including those investigated by the internationally renowned Garzón.

Read the rest here =>
Recommend this Post


More =>

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, May 04, 2009

Paul Mitchell and Chris Marsden, "Spanish judge launches new torture probe," World Socialist Web Site, May 1, 2009.

Spain’s top investigative judge, Baltasar Garzón, has launched a new criminal investigation into allegations of torture at Guantánamo Bay and other US prison camps that will target the “possible material authors, enablers and accomplices” of the illegal abuse of detainees.

In a strongly worded court order issued Wednesday, Garzón indicated that he would investigate the role of high-level Bush administration officials in what he called an “authorized and systematic plan for torture and harsh treatment of people deprived of their freedom without any charges and without the most basic elemental rights for detainees, set forth and demanded by international treaties.”

  Top Bush administration officials, including the former president, now have good reason to avoid leaving the US...


Read the rest here =>
Recommend this Post


More =>

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, April 27, 2009

J D Tucille, "The Obama administration should prosecute torture officials (but probably won't)," Examiner, April 23, 2009.

[Antiwar.com provides an alternative headline for this piece: "No torture prosecutions without public pressure." -jlt]

The question of the hour -- well, one of the questions, anyway -- is whether President Barack Obama will permit or even encourage the Department of Justice to prosecute torturers and the Bush administration officials who enabled them. Obama is playing Hamlet, with "no, I won't" moments alternating with hints of "yes, I will." As a result, he's managed to draw fire from both civil libertarians and hard-line hawks. But the truth of the matter is that the current president and his advisors are probably worried that they, themselves, may some day end up as defendants if they hold their predecessors accountable for their crimes.

Let's be clear -- the Bush administration presided over some unspeakable acts. The Red Cross and the Center for the Study of Human Rights in the Americas are among the organizations that documented deliberate and systematic abuse of detainees at Guantanamo and elsewhere. Prisoners have been subject to suffocation by water, prolonged standing with arms chained above their heads, beatings, confinement in a box, sleep deprivation and other tactics that involve both physical and psychological abuse.

  ...running through the minds of Obama administration officials right about now are fevered images of hearings and trials four or eight years in the future, holding them accountable for their own crimes.

Read the rest here =>Recommend this Post


More =>

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, April 16, 2009

"Israel will not cooperate with UN Gaza inquiry," AlertNet/Reuters, April 15, 2009.

JERUSALEM, April 15 (Reuters) - Israel does not plan to cooperate with a U.N. agency's investigation into alleged war crimes by Israeli troops and Hamas militants during fighting in Gaza, an Israeli government official said on Wednesday.

Israeli forces launched a 22-day offensive in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip in late December with the stated goal of stopping cross-border rockets fired by Palestinian militants.

According to a Palestinian rights group, 1,417 Palestinians, including 926 civilians, were killed in the fighting. Israel disputes those figures.

The United Nations Human Rights Council appointed former U.N. war crimes prosector Richard Goldstone this month to head the investigation into allegations of human rights violations by both sides during the Dec. 27 to Jan. 18 conflict.

The Israeli government official said a letter was sent to Goldstone, a South African judge, through the Israeli embassy in Geneva informing him and the council that Israel believed it was "impossible to cooperate with the committee" in its inquiry.

Read the rest here =>
Recommend this Post


More =>

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Who is responsible to protect Gaza?

Dear Michael Ignatieff:

Clearly the Palestinian Authority cannot.

Who then?

Hamas?

Israel?

For more on the responsibility to protect (R2P) =>

This open letter may be sung to the tune of "Someone to watch over me."
Recommend this Post


More =>

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Conor Gearty, "Israel, Gaza and international law," openDemocracy, January 21, 2009.

The Israeli attack on the Gaza strip in has exposed the relative impotence of international law in the face of determined sovereign action. On 8 January 2009, the United Nations Security Council called for "an immediate, durable and fully respected ceasefire, leading to the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza." It also urgently insisted on the "unimpeded provision and distribution throughout Gaza of humanitarian assistance, including of food, fuel and medical treatment."

  This is not solely or even mainly about whether the operation was justified; the concern is rather with how it was conducted.

On 9 January the UN high commissioner for human rights, Navi Pillay, told a special session of the Human Rights Council (HRC) that "international human-rights law must apply in all circumstances and at all times." The high commissioner strongly urged the parties to the conflict "to fulfil their obligations under international humanitarian law to collect, care for and evacuate the wounded and to protect and respect health workers, hospitals, and medical units and ambulances." Pillay also called on each side "to allow the deployment of independent human-rights monitors in both Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory to document any violations of international-human rights and humanitarian law."

In reminding the HRC that "violations of international humanitarian law may constitute war crimes for which individual criminal responsibility may be invoked", she suggested that the council "should consider authorising a mission to assess violations committed by both sides in the conflict in order to establish the relevant facts and ensure accountability." In its resolution on 12 January, the council said that it "strongly condemns the ongoing military operation carried out ... in the occupied Gaza Strip, which [has] resulted in massive violations of human rights of Palestinian people and systematic destruction of the Palestinian infrastructure"; it decided to send "an urgent independent international fact-finding mission" to investigate what is going on.

  The argument - based on the right of national self-defence in Article 51 of the UN charter, together with the alleged use by Hamas of civilian areas from which to launch rockets on Israel - might not be able to survive a few hours in a court of law; but all it needs to withstand is at most five minutes' interrogation in the media, and it is more than fit for this purpose.

Read the rest, indluding numerous links, here =>
Recommend this Post


More =>

Sphere: Related Content